※ 返回首页 ※ 在线留言  ※ 联系我们
人工智能将应用于法院审判 准确率可达79%:AG九游会唯一官网
您的位置: 首页 > 新闻中心 > 常见问题 > 人工智能将应用于法院审判 准确率可达79%:AG九游会唯一官网

人工智能将应用于法院审判 准确率可达79%:AG九游会唯一官网

作者:AG九游会    发布时间:2021-09-11 00:42:07     浏览次数 :

本文摘要:An artificial intelligence that predicts the outcome of court proceedings may sound like a futuristic dream.人工智能预测法院诉讼结果有可能听得一起看起来个遥不可及的梦想。

An artificial intelligence that predicts the outcome of court proceedings may sound like a futuristic dream.人工智能预测法院诉讼结果有可能听得一起看起来个遥不可及的梦想。But a new study claims to have developed an AI that predict the results of human rights trials with 79 per cent accuracy.但是一项近期研究认为,研发者早已研发出有了一种预测人权审判结果的人工智能技术,其准确度超过了79%。The technology is the first to predict the outcomes of major international court trials by analysing case text using a machine learning algorithm, claim the researchers.研究人员回应,通过运用机器学习算法,研究国际先例的判决文书,预测最重要国际法院审判结果的技术尚属首例。The method was devised by researchers at University College London (UCL), the University of Sheffield and the University of Pennsylvania.这是伦敦学院大学、雪菲尔大学,以及宾夕法尼亚大学合作开发的项目。

We dont see AI replacing judges or lawyers, but we think theyd find it useful for rapidly identifying patterns in cases that lead to certain outcomes, explained Dr Nikolaos Aletras, who led the study at UCL Computer Science.伦敦学院大学计算机科学院的该研究负责人尼古劳斯·阿尔特拉斯博士说明道:“人工智能会代替法官或律师,但是我们指出人们不会找到人工智能益处良多,它需要较慢辨识造成某种特定结果的案件类型。”It could also be a valuable tool for highlighting which cases are most likely to be violations of the European Convention on Human Rights.“它还十分有利于找到哪些案件最有可能违背《欧洲人权公约》。”The researchers found that judgements by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) are highly linked to non-legal facts, rather than directly legal arguments.研究人员找到,欧洲人权法院(ECtHR)的审判与非法律事件息息相关,而不是必要基于法律证据。This suggests that the judges of the court are, in the jargon of legal theory, realists, rather than formalists.用法律理论的行话来说就是,法院的法官是“现实主义者”,而非“形式主义者”。